Nana Akomea, a leading figure in the New Patriotic Party (NPP), has come out strongly in defense of President Nana Akufo-Addo amid the ongoing controversy surrounding Ghana’s Founders’ Day celebrations. The debate, which has stirred significant public interest, centers on the recognition and commemoration of the country’s founding figures.
During a recent discussion, veteran journalist Kwesi Pratt criticized the current administration’s stance on Founders’ Day, arguing that it unfairly diminishes the contributions of Dr. Kwame Nkrumah, Ghana’s first President. Pratt’s comments have sparked widespread debate, highlighting the deep-seated divisions over how Ghana’s history should be honored.
Nana Akomea, in his response, accused Pratt of being unfair to President Akufo-Addo and his government. Akomea emphasized that the decision to institute Founders’ Day on August 4 was meant to recognize all contributors to Ghana’s independence, not just Dr. Nkrumah. He argued that the inclusion of other notable figures like J.B. Danquah, Emmanuel Obetsebi-Lamptey, and William Ofori Atta reflects a more comprehensive view of the country’s liberation struggle.
“Kwesi Pratt’s criticism overlooks the broader perspective of Ghana’s history,” Akomea stated. “Founders’ Day is not about diminishing Nkrumah’s role but acknowledging that the fight for independence was a collective effort involving many brave individuals.”
The debate over Founders’ Day is not new. It has been a contentious issue since President Akufo-Addo established the holiday in 2017, shifting the focus from the previously celebrated September 21, Nkrumah’s birthday, to August 4. This date commemorates the founding of the United Gold Coast Convention (UGCC) in 1947, which played a pivotal role in the country’s push for independence.
Critics of the change, including Pratt, argue that it undermines Nkrumah’s legacy as the central figure in Ghana’s independence movement. They contend that Nkrumah’s vision and leadership were instrumental in achieving the country’s freedom from colonial rule.
Supporters of the new holiday, however, believe it provides a more inclusive narrative. They assert that recognizing the contributions of various leaders and activists offers a richer, more nuanced understanding of Ghana’s journey to independence.
Amid the heated debate, President Akufo-Addo has maintained that the decision to honor multiple founders is in line with historical accuracy. He has urged Ghanaians to embrace a holistic view of their history, one that celebrates the collective efforts of all who fought for the nation’s freedom.
As the discussion continues, it highlights the broader challenge of how nations remember and honor their past. The way history is commemorated can shape national identity and influence contemporary political discourse.
Despite differing opinions, there is a shared recognition of the importance of Ghana’s independence struggle. Both sides agree that educating future generations about the country’s history is crucial. The hope is that through dialogue and understanding, Ghanaians can find common ground and celebrate their rich heritage in a way that unites rather than divides.
Source: GhanaWeb
