In a dramatic turn of events at the High Court in Accra, Attorney-General Godfred Yeboah Dame found himself at the center of controversy following claims by businessman Richard Jakpa. Jakpa, currently on trial alongside Minority Leader Dr. Cassiel Ato Forson, alleged that Dame had been contacting him during unconventional hours. This claim has catalyzed a series of legal motions against the Attorney-General, marking his first public response to the allegations.
Legal Motions and Calls for Inquiry
The case, which has captured public attention, revolves around accusations of a €2.37 million financial loss to the state linked to an ambulance procurement deal. Following Jakpa’s allegations, four critical motions were filed: an inquiry into Dame’s conduct, a mistrial, a stay of proceedings, and a motion to strike out the charges against Jakpa.
Dr. Forson, taking a firm stance, attributes these developments to a calculated attempt by the Attorney-General to sway the trial unfairly. He argues that such actions threaten the sanctity of his right to a fair trial, urging the court to intervene decisively.
In response, the Office of the Attorney-General has vigorously defended its conduct through affidavits that deny any wrongdoing. These documents argue that the continuation of the prosecution is not only justified but essential for maintaining public trust in the legal system. They emphasize that the allegations, although serious, do not undermine the court’s capacity to administer justice impartially.
The affidavits reiterate the commitment of Dame’s office to conclude the case based on credible evidence, highlighting the need to treat all individuals equally under the law regardless of their political or social standing. This stance comes amid heightened scrutiny and the potential implications these proceedings may have on the broader legal and political landscape in Ghana.
Source: Graphic Online
